Explorer · candidates
Thematic allusions
When a Founder invokes a Shakespearean character as a type, not a quotation.
What this is. These are cases where a Founder mentions a recognisable character (Brutus, Falstaff, Hotspur, Shylock, etc.) in a way the surrounding context suggests is invoking the figure as a type rather than as a strictly historical reference. Things like “Harrison was another Sir John Falstaff” (Adams 1776) or “a million of Brutuses” (Jefferson 1800). The classification depends on context-word cues (like, another, modern, would-be, latter-day).
Shakespeare-only vs Roman-ambiguous. Not every character on this list reaches the Founders only through Shakespeare. Brutus, Caesar, and Cassius lived in Plutarch’s Lives and in eighteenth-century classical education before they lived in Julius Caesar. Hamilton’s 1779 “spice of Julius Caesar or Cromwell” pairs two historical strongmen and almost certainly isn’t a Shakespeare reference. The project records the Roman names as ambiguous rather than counting them as Shakespearean evidence. The Shakespeare-Only Characters essay walks through the criterion.
Counting unit. Each row is a unique (Founder, document, character) combination. The 1815 Adams letter to John Taylor that invokes both Brutus and Cassius as figures of aristocratic persistence counts as two rows (one each), not the six it originally produced before within-document deduplication. The total count of distinct rows after dedup is in the per-Founder list below.
When the criterion is tightened to characters that can only have come from Shakespeare (Falstaff, Shylock, Hotspur, Lady Macbeth, Iago, Polonius, etc.), 6 distinct passages survive, all of them Adams between 1776 and 1818. The other 12 passages invoke Roman figures (Brutus, Caesar, Cassius) whose source is ambiguous between Shakespeare and Plutarch. Both tallies are real; the project just doesn’t conflate them. Each row below carries a tier badge so the distinction stays visible at the passage level.